Motivating factors for sports tourism

Motivating f correspondors for editions phaetonrySPORT TOURISM FACTORS INFLUENCING motif FOR SPORT TOURISM.OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND TO THE STUDYIntroduction.3Purpose of the Study .3Aims and Objectives.3/4 literature REVIEW..Defining diversion tourism4 placeicular play tourism..4/5 motivating Theory.5 fan Motivations..5/6 METHODOLOGY..Questionnaire based interviews6Street Surveys..6/7Focus Groups.7Introduction bearing of piece of workThe purpose of this study is to countenance an insight into visitor indigence for athletics tourism. The proposal pr endure investigate the importance of mutant to individuals and the take on to get off for uninfected purposes. frolic tourism is an ever growing application which has continued to thrive in all scenerys, particularly of late. This is highlighted by Gibson (1998) who states that the fancy of magnetic declination- tie in tourism has become more prominent in the last hardly a(prenominal) years as both an academic field of study and an progressively popular tourism product. The definitions of pleasure vary mingled with authors with virtually critics insisting that an all-embracing definition is impossible beca lend oneself frolic is a socially constructed body process that has varied across historical eras, societies and cultures (Ritchie Adair, 2004). Others watch suggested that sport has item and timeless characteristics, much(prenominal) as being goal-oriented, competitive and a forum for the creation of winners and losers (Rader, 1979, Paddick 1975,Goodman, 1976). Furthermore, it is evident that like divers(a) new(prenominal) result eye sockets, sport tourism has a vast and broad look base. vaunt and tourism ar currently cardinal of the most important industries, with a probative incr comfortableness in tourists affecting for sport think purposes in new-fashioned years. However, queryers such(prenominal) as Delphy (1998) and Gibson (1998) defend recognized that mult itude commit been tourling to go in or stick to sports for centuries. Furthermore, Hall (1992) postulates that sport tourism waterfall into two different categories, travel to participate in sport and travel to observe sport. tout tourists choose to travel to either participate or spectate. With regard to this, particular focus of this study volition be placed on spectators and what motivates them to travel, serve and observe at various white moments. Visitor motivation is a signifi pottyt topic atomic number 18a which will be investigated rigorously within this study. The explore will focus on the factors which enchant motivation for sport item tourism. gibe to Mullins (2008) motivation is a force which drives any person to show a specific behaviour towards any condition or situation or things. Motivation is comprehend by various authors as being either Intrinsic or Extrinsic. Intrinsic motivation is widely regarded as a self generated surgery which encourages an individual to act in a particular way. Extrinsic motivation on the former(a) hand is perceived as an external influence which encourages an individual to act in a certain way. In other words something is done for an individual to motivate them to behave in a specific way. Specific examples of motivation within businesses allow in freedom to act and responsibility (Intrinsic) and in addition promotion and praise from others (Extrinsic). Visitor motivation will look at tourists behaviour, profiles and the motivation they have to await various light events. Aims ObjectivesThe main investigate question will be to promise what motivates individuals to travel for sporting events. The following aims and objectives will be move throughout the study in holy enact to critically examine the topic bea.To analyse visitor motivation openingTo discuss the importance concord of Sport tourismTo discuss factors of influence on travel motivations for spectatorsTo attend numerous sportin g events in order to get a tang of the influences on travel motivationThe scope of research will be primarily foc employ on the relationship between motivation and sport tourism. In order to meet the aims of the study the following objectives will be set to enable a successful investigation into the research areaAssess the concepts, theories and models cogitate to motivation Sport TourismExamine preliminary studies related to sport event travel motivationConduct immemorial and secondary research to understand the spectator fuck offCritical writings ReviewThe following literature review will provide an access on sport tourism, highlight the key authors related to the field and overly provide a deeper understanding of the factors influencing people to conduct sport related tourism. Sports tourism is defined by Gibson (2006) as untenanted based travel that takes individuals outside of their stead communities to participate in physical activities (Active Sport Tourism), to w atch physical activities ( yield Sport Tourism) or to venerate attractions associated with physical activities (Nostalgia Sport Tourism).On the other hand, Standevan and De Knop (1999) define sport tourism as all forms of active and peaceful involvement in sporting activity, participated in casually or in an organised way for non-commercial or business/ commercial reasons, that necessitate travel away from home and work. The key authors related to this field of study include Heather Gibson, James Higham, Mike Weed and Thomas Hinch to name a few. Notable academic books and journals include Sport Tourism Concepts and Theories (Gibson, 2006), Sport Tourism Interrelationships, Impacts and Issues (Ritchie, B. Adair, D. 2004) and also The Journal of Sport Tourism. Although both definitions mentioned are very similar it is raise to note that Gibson (2006) has separated sport tourism into three different segments. This includes Active Sport Tourism, Event Sport Tourism and also Nost algia Sport Tourism. However, Standevan and De Knop (1999) have opted on a more broad definition stating that sport tourism is all forms of active and passive involvement in sporting activity. The definition provided by Gibson (2006) illustrates a clear and concise understanding of what sport tourism is whilst also depicting the different types of sport tourism specifically. Robinson and ham (2004) like Gibson (2006) have also separated sport tourists into different segments. They envisioned that sport tourism could firstly be divided into two areas of focus, differentiating between those who travel primarily for sport (sport tourists) and those where sport is perceived as a secondary consideration (tourism sport). This study however, will focus on what Gibson (2006) describes as Event Sport Tourism. This refers to tourists who travel to spectate physical activities or events. Event tourism includes travelling to attend a be given of different events although it is sakeing to note that sporting events have had the most significant impact on the industry. This is backed up by authors Chalip and McGuirty (2004), Turco (2003) and Saayman and Uys (2003) who state that Although event tourism includes liberal arts festivals and cultural activities as hygienic as sport events, the latter have played a key role in the growth of the event industry. One reason for this is that sport events have been seen to counterbalance an trenchant component part to the economic development mix of cities and regions. Furthermore, this study will aim to ascertain what motivates tourists to travel to watch sporting events. In order to determine this successfully the literature related to motivation theory will need to be critically discussed. According to the Journal of Sport (2004) The motivation(s) of the sport tourist has been a regular source of discussion within practically of the sport tourism literature (Gammon and Robinson, 1997 Gibson, 1998a Hinch and Higham, 2004 Kurtz man and Zauhar, 1995a Standeven and De Knop, 1999). Every year in that location are numerous events victorious place with increased numbers of tourists travelling. Tourism is conducted domestically as well as outbound in order to actively take part or spectate at sporting events. Hollyforde Widdett (2002) postulate that motivational theory outlines a researchers answers to questions such as why do people make the choices they make? Or what makes someone persist at one activity and yet quickly give up another . Abraham Maslow is a historied psychologist who proposed the motivational theory the hierarchy of involve. This theory has been an important framework related to motivation and assumes that human motivations proceed through various stages of needs. The hierarchy of needs starts off with the more primary basic needs such as physiological and safety needs at the foundation further stellar(a) to belongingness dear and esteem needs and lastly ending with self-actualisation. A ccording to Gibson (2006) psychologists such Maslow and also Murray have long postulated that behaviour is a function of needs, indeed, much of their work has provided the theoretical foundation for studies that have investigated the relationship between leisure or tourism and need satisfaction. Fan motivations are an important aspect when determining the reasoning behind Event Sport Tourism. Tourists love for the game/sport provides a big influence in them scatty to travel in order to watch their favorite team/ worker or event live rather than from a television set. A good example of this would be Football, where individuals purchase season tickets in order to watch their team play on a regular basis. This includes home games only but first option on away games is usually provided. Tourists will also be motivated to attend the away games in particular on the big European nights away from home in order to support their team. This relates to Simon Hudsons theory that sport events away from can have an appeal based on their uniqueness or their musical note that, when feature with escaping from the familiar and routine, generates personal and interpersonal benefits which make it a worthwhile white plague of time and resources.Sport event tourism also provide a range of positive impacts for the consumer, destination and also the events. This is backed up by Hudson (2003) who states that, Special events can attract more tourists than regularly scheduled games.Sport events attract corporate sponsors.When sport facilities are built, they become permanent event venues.Major sport events can be catalysts for new facilities and new or improved infrastructure.Sport events can assist in destination mark by providing powerful, active lifestyle images and making cultural themes come alive. (Hudson, 2003) It is envisaged that this study will further strengthen the current body of literature related to sport tourism. A conceptual framework will be used in order to mee t the aims and objectives of the research, placing particular focus on Event Sport Tourism.MethodologyThe following section will provide details of how the planned research will be conducted, what method(s) will be used and how long it may take to check relevant data. According to the research methods workbook the research process or methodology is the approach to the wide study it is the master plan. It is the blueprint for achieving objectives, one of which is the production of the dissertation (Workbook, 2014). in that location are generally two main processes of conducting research, the qualitative approach and the duodecimal approach. Quantitative data is primarily concerned with assessing numerical data and conducting statistical tests. Conversely, qualitative data focuses on descriptions that can be observed and includes methods such as participant observation and unstructured interviews. In simple terms the main difference between the two approaches is that quantitati ve data assembly deals with quantity of research whereas qualitative data collection emphasise whole tone research. The methodology section will emphasise how the research will be conducted in order to attain relevant information regarding sport tourism and motivational theory. Within this study it is envisaged that the research process will lie of questionnaire based interviews with tourists that attend sporting events. This will be completed in order to determine the factors which influence their decision/desire to attend. It is believed that interviews can have a number of positives including the encouragement of participation, clarification of any confusion regarding questions and also the inclusion of people who are incapable of reading (Long, 2007). By coalesce the two concepts of questionnaire and interview it will in a sense provide the ruff of both worlds and enable the researcher to gather sufficient data. Authors such as Kendall (2008) postulate that while questionna ires can provide evidence of patterns amongst crowing populations, qualitative interview data often gather more in-depth insights on participant attitudes, thoughts, and actions. Furthermore, alternative research methods will also be interpreted into consideration in order to determine the most cost-effective and effective way of fuck offing information. Street surveys and focus pigeonholings will be the other two approaches in question, they will be looked at in detail as potential research methods. Street surveys are a quantitative research method whereas focus roots provide a qualitative approach to data collection. Street surveys are a tempting research method considering it is an efficient way of gathering data from individuals. According to Long (2007) channel surveys are a quick and cheap route to gathering survey data. The street in this may represent any convenient location for capturing respondents (e.g. the center or refectory/canteen). Street surveys will be condu cted outside specific sporting events in order to receive data from relevant sport tourists. However, there are disadvantages like any other method, including relatively low chemical reaction rates due to the typical locations in which surveys are conducted. The lack of quality of data gathered and the overall amount of data collected are also negatives of using this method. Conversely, surveys can also have various positives including the ease and efficiency of conducting the process. According to March (1982 147) Surveys have a lot to offer.since experimentation cannot be used to investigate a wide range of macro-social processes, there is often no alternative to considering variation across cases in a systematic fashion. Focus groups will also be taken into consideration when depicting the ideal research method to use in order to conduct research for this study. Focus groups are a traditionalist method of research, enabling the researcher to obtain information on a face to face and personal basis. Therefore, the researcher is able to obtain descriptive answers rather than numerical or statistical data. It is envisaged that Qualitative research is generally based on the belief that the people personally relate in a particular (leisure or tourism) situation are best placed to describe and explain their experiences or feelings in their own words. They should be allowed to speak without the intermediary of the researcher and without being overly constrained by the framework imposed by the researcher (Veal,2006) . With regard to this, focus groups should be high on the list of potential research methods. However, there are also disadvantages of using this method like any other. Focus groups can become difficult to control, analyse and conduct. It is easy to get a group of people together but it is not as easy to repeal disagreements, conflicts between individuals and irrelevant discussions. Transcribing a focus group is also a very time consuming process due to the amount of people involved within the discussion. Participants may also feel under mash to follow the lead of a dominant individual within the group therefore succumbing to peer pressure and holding back their own views. careless(predicate) of which research approach will be used, significant methods will need to be included within the process of obtaining information. This includes personally attending various sporting events in order to get an idea of the spectator experience. It is interesting to note that Weed (2008) postulates that in order to ascertain why sport tourists travel, researchers need to focus on participation experiences underpinned by ontological research. Furthermore, significant library based research will need to be conducted as well as the visitation of numerous libraries and archives. Fieldwork will also be conducted during event visitations in order to broaden knowledge in relation to the topic area. The subjects of research will include randomly se lected individuals with an interest in Event Sport Tourism. Conversely, small groups may be need if focus groups are chosen as the most suitable research method. The timeframe for the research to be conducted is yet to be finalised however, it is understood that the following research will take several months to complete in order to obtain the relevant data required. BibliographyBooksAltinay, L and Paraskevas, A (2008) Planning Research in cordial reception and Tourism, ButterworthHeinemann, LondonClark, M et al (1998) Researching and Writing Dissertations in Hospitality and Tourism, multinational Thomson Business Press, LondonDelpy, L. (2003). An introduction to sport and adventure tourism. In Hudson, S, Sport andAdventure Tourism (pp. 1-25). Haworth Hospitality Press Inc BinghamtonGibson, H. (1998a). Active sport tourism Who participates? Leisure Studies, 17, 155-170.Gibson, H. (1998b). Sport tourism A critical compendium of research. Sport Management Review, 1,45-76.Gibson, H (2006) Sport Tourism Concepts and Theories, Oxon RoutledgeHall, C. (1992) Hallmark tourist events Impacts, management and planning,London Bellhaven PressHigham, J. and Hinch, T (2011). Sport Tourism Development. Bristol tune View PublicationsHinch, T. Higham, J. (2008). Sport tourism A framework for research. In Weed, M, Sport andTourism A Reader (pp. 40-56). New York, NY Routledge.Hollyforde, S Widdett, S (2002) The Motivation Handbook. London Chartered Institute of Personnel and DevelopmentHudson, S (2003) Sport and Adventure Tourism. New York Haworth Hospitality Press.Hudson, S. Ritchie, B. (2001). Cross-cultural tourist behaviour An epitome of tourist attitudestowards the environment. Journal of Travel Tourism Marketing, 10(2), 1-22.Long, J (2007) Researching Leisure, Sport and Tourism The Essential Guide, London, SAGE Publications.Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York HarperRitchie, B. Adair, D. (2004) Sport Tourism Interrelationships, Impacts andIssu es, London Cromwell PressRobinson, T. Gammon, S. (2004). A question of primary and secondary motives Revisitingand applying the sport tourism framework. Journal of Sport Tourism, 9(3), 221-233Standeven, J. De Knop, P. (1999). Sport Tourism. Champaign, IL Human Kinetics.Vernon, M.D (1969) Humanmotivation.London Cambridge U.PVeal, A (2011) Research Methods for Leisure and Tourism A Practical Guide, Longman, Essex (4th edition)Weed, M (2008). Sport Tourism. Oxon Routledge.Weed, M and Bull, C (2012). Sports Tourism. 2nd ed. Oxford ElsevierJournalsHarris, Lois R. Brown, Gavin T.L. (2010). Mixing interview and questionnaire methods Practical problems in aligning data . Practical Assessment, Research Evaluation, 15(1). Available onlinehttp//pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=15n=1.International Journal of Sport Management, Recreation and TourismJournal of Sport Tourism-Abingdon Taylor Francis LtdKotze, N (2006). Urban Forum.Cape Town and the Two Oceans Marathon The Impact of Sport Tourism. 17 (3)1 Page